Posts Tagged ‘Constitution’

A New American Revolution?

Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Feb 18 2010

February, 17th of 2010 dawns a new American revolution. An extravaganza of conservative leaders gathered at Mount Vernon to sign a new political initiative.  The Mount Vernon Statement is a mantra of conservatism. A reminder of our nations roots. This is the new calling card of the republican party; a call to arms for conservatives to rise up against over-large and ever growing government that has trample the Constitution’s concept of limited government.

The Mount Vernon Statement looks good on paper but is it real? Will the signers of this new declaration to return the will of the people to the people be beholden to this document as were the Founding Fathers were when they signed The Declaration of Independence? Or will this “Historic Document” merely go down in history as going down in flames?

Will the signers of this document walk the walk? Or is this just lip service to the Tea Party Movement?

The signing of the Declaration of Independence

The signing of the Declaration of Independence

Exactly what is it  that makes The Declaration of Independence so special, so important, of such great consequence? The consequence of course. The document itself - though the rallying cry of the ages and a symbol of our freedoms and liberties - is just ink on paper. Do not misunderstand. I am in no way shape or form trying to diminish the grandeur and importance of The Declaration of Independence. I am simply trying to say that it was the men who wrote it that make it so grand and important.

These men stood up against what they understood to be an oppressive governing body with much more than empty words. They believed their document to be much more than just ink on paper. They stood by their statement and were willing to sacrifice all that they held dear on this earth in hopes of a better tomorrow. If the revolution had failed they would have been tried for  treason and executed.

So what penalty will the men and women who have consigned themselves to this new statement suffer if it is just ink on paper? They may be humiliated in the press; They may be called names; Maybe even lose their jobs. Certainly not death or bodily harm

Clearly they have almost nothing to lose. They are humiliated, and called names on a daily basis now. And most are more than affluent in their lives anyway.

The comparison of the latter pales to the former; the stakes aren’t high enough to hold them to their statement.

Tea Party Power

The tea Party movement now in full swing is most certainly having its effect on the political landscape. Their cause is obvious; they want a return to a smaller government, to be held to their own self interests and not big brothers. Yet again - though honorable and patriotic as their intentions may be - they do not fear the consequences of The Founding Fathers.

They all assemble before the various government buildings in Washington armed with admonitory signs and snappy slogans and catchphrases - some angry mob. Afterward they go back to their daily lives hoping they made some lasting impression on the politicians hiding inside. With no worry of retribution they stuff their signs in the closet until the next big rally.

So what is my point in all of this? Do they have the will to see it through? What are they willing to sacrifice for their cause?

A new American Revolution?  I think not.

I support the Tea Party movement and I applaud the signers of The Mount Vernon Statement but I myself will be watching these people for sincerity. I also noticed that the Washington politicians haven’t lined up to sign this statement meant to  support of the very documents they took an oath to uphold.

It’s a Cracked World!

  • Share/Bookmark

Tenth Amendment to Play a Part in State Sovereignty

Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Mar 08 2009

It’s been over 200 years since the signing of the Bill of Rights yet our  freedoms and our sovereignty are once again misunderstood by the people who are supposed to champion the cause. The federal government for years has been asserting authority over the individual states passing sweeping nation wide legislation as it sees fit; well no more several states have said by passing their own legislation to thwart the federal governments’ unfounded authority over their sovereignty.

Over 20 states including Montana South Carolina, and many other Republican leaning states have moved on legislation calling for more individual control over their own states.These states want the right to ignore laws they believe to be unconstitutional based on the Tenth Amendment.

Governor Brad Henry - Oklahoma

Governor Brad Henry - Oklahoma

Oklahoma state Sen. Randy Brogdon, a Republican, was the first to forge this kind of legislation in 2008 after President Georg W. Bush and Congress overstepped their bounds with the passing of the Real ID Act, a law which imposes certain security standards for the state driver’s licenses and state IDs.

Brogdons’ bill passed through Oklahomas’ state Congressional Chamber So if Governor Brad Henry were to sign it into law, it would in theory let the state of Oklahoma ignore laws passed by the federal government that are not permitted by the Constitution as interpreted by the State itself.

The state of Montana is trying to exempt itself from federal regulation of firearms, and Missouri wants the authority to pass its’ own legislation in regard to abortion. The South Carolina State Senator Lee Bright has pushed for similar law because he thinks the federal government is acting beyond the scope of the Constituion on the new stimulus bill passed in January of 2009.

All of the bills mentioned use the Tenth Amendment for presidence; which reads as such:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

In short it means that authorities not given to the feds by the Constitution or disallowed by the states is left up to the states to decide on.

Numerous other states have set out to pass similar bills in response to the broad sweeping power of the $800 billion stimulus package. Many state legislators want portions of the money but disagree with the action as a whole; believing they should be able to accept the money on their own terms. While they are criticized by Washington for wanting to have their cake and eat it too, they maintain that this is allowed by the Tenth Amendment and that state sovereignty is at stake.

They walk on shaky ground with such creative legislation, think of the messes that could be created by egos in Washington who never seem to know where to draw the line on anything. In fact if Congress and or the White House had a clue as to when enough was enough we wouldn’t be having this discussion at all.

It has always been my understanding that the founding fathers who penned the Bill of Rights and the Constitution wanted the states to govern themselves with the federal body being there only to serve as the glue to bind the states together on more general and broad sweeping issues. That being said the federal government has been living beyond its means for decades if not an entire century.

Here are the questions that come to my mind:

  • Should such actions be allowed by individual states?
  • Should the federal government moderate what states are allowed to decide for themselves?
  • Should the Supreme Court needs to rule on such issues? It is their job to interpret the meaning of The Constitution.

Now would be a good time for that Department of Common Sense, I have previously spoken of, to be formed. Because these people, on both sides of the issue know not what they do.

This is a prime example of the  Cracked World.

  • Share/Bookmark