Posts Tagged ‘Auto Industry’

GM Bankruptcy Bad for America

Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Jun 01 2009

As expected it was announced today that GM filed chapter 11 bankruptcy. While this is no surprise and many

General Motors Head Quarters

General Motors Head Quarters

believe it is the best thing that could have happened to the Auto maker it will be a bitter pill to swallow. Already the Obama administration has handed over another $33 billion of government (taxpayer) funds. This brings the total to well over $50 billion leaving many Americans are skeptical including myself.Don’t take my word for it, here’s a poll conducted by Fox Forums. At the time of this writing 92% think we will never see the money we “sank” in GM also known as Government Motors.

I for one would like to know exactly what Obama’s intentions are.

“Our goal is to help GM get back on its feet … and get out quickly,” Obama said.

He said the government would act as “reluctant shareholders” and that he has “no interest” in running GM. Yet the federal government now holds a 60% interest in General Motors.

Foxnews.com supplied an outline of GM’s bankruptcy plan.

The outlines of the restructured GM are as follows:

  • Cut GM’s production break-even point from 16 million annual unit sales to 10 million.
  • UAW concessions include allowing GM to shed its $20 billion obligation to its pensions and health care fund, otherwise known as the VEBA. The White House said the UAW concessions were more substantial than those sought by the Bush administration when it was considering throwing the company a taxpayer lifeline.
  • Bondholders representing at least 54 percent of the company’s unsecured bonds have agreed to trade their portion of GM’s $27.1 billion in unsecured debt for a pro-rated share of 10 percent of the equity in the so-called new GM. In addition, the bondholders will receive warrants for an additional 15 percent of the company. The bankruptcy process, which the White House said should take between 60 and 90 days, will enforce this distribution as well as adjudicate proceeds for bondholders who do not participate in the White House deal.
  • The reorganized GM will buy most of the old GM assets needed to carry out its business plan. The purchase will happen in the Chapter 11 process. In exchange, the U.S. government will relinquish a majority of its loans to GM.– The new GM will create an independent trust (VEBA) that will finance health care benefits for GM’s retirees. The VEBA will be funded by a note of $2.5 billion payable in three installments that end in 2017. There will be an additional $6.5 billion purchase that will create 9 percent perpetual preferred stock. The VEBA will also receive 17.5 percent of the equity of New GM and warrants to purchase an additional 2.5 percent of the company. The VEBA will be able to chose one independent director for the new board. It will have no right to vote its shares or other exercise other governance rights.– The GM-qualified pensions for current hourly and salaried employees will be transferred to the new GM.
  • Treasury will provide $30.1 billion of debtor-in-possession financing to support GM through an accelerated Chapter 11 process. Officials anticipate no additional funding for GM. “There is no plan of any kind for future support beyond this point,” an official said.The government will receive $8.8 billion in debt and preferred stock and 60 percent of the company’s equity. Treasury will appoint all new board of directors members not appointed by the VEBA and the Canadian government.
  • Governments in Canada and Ontario will lend $9.5 billion to GM and the new GM. The Canadian and Ontario governments will receive approximately $1.7 billion in debt and preferred stock, and approximately 12 percent of the equity of the new GM. The Canadian government will select one director to the new GM board.
  • The new GM will, as part of the government-supervised restructuring, build a new small car in an idled UAW factory. The goal is to increase the share of U.S. production for U.S. sale from 66 percent currently to 70 percent.

These are the White House “principles” for managing the ownership stake:

  • The government will sell equity stakes as “soon as practicable.” The goal is a profitable company without government involvement.– The government will reserve the right to set up-front conditions to protect taxpayers, promote financial stability and encourage growth.
  • The government will manage its ownership stake in a hands-off, commercial manner. It will not interfere with day-to-day company operations. No government employees will serve on the boards or be employed by these companies.
  • The government will only vote on core governance issues, including the selection of a company’s board of directors and major corporate events or transactions.

So the sale of equity stakes will take place, “as soon as practicable.” Kind of like all of the Banks the government currently owns which are not allowed to pay back the TARP money they received a few months ago?

The government will only vote on core governance issues,like the selection of the company’s board members and major corporate transactions. This still allows them to stack the deck with whom ever they want to run the company. After all Obama did fire former CEO Richard Wagner. So I would expect him to put in place a puppet board to run the company as he sees fit.

Shortly after the filings were made official President Obama made a speech, something he seems to be making a pass time of, to address the bankruptcy issue. In this speech he made some ghastly statements concerning it’s effect on the state of the economy.

I will not pretend the hard times are over. Difficult days lie ahead. More jobs will be lost. More plants will close. More dealerships will shut their doors, and so will many parts suppliers. But I want you to know that what you’re doing is making a sacrifice for the next generation, a sacrifice you may not have chose to make, but a sacrifice you are nevertheless called to make so that your children and  of our children can grow up in America that still makes things, that still builds cars, that still strives for a better future.

Sacrifice? Sacrifice? Sacrifice for a better future. President Obama didn’t care about our childrens’  future when he squandered it away in all of his ridiculous spending plans that he has shoved down our throats over the last 4 months.

We already know that the government is going to control the kinds of cars and trucks that the Auto makers will be allowed to make by imposing new emissions and fuel economy restrictions on the car companies; and in doing so he is guiding GM and Chrysler in the direction he wants them to go in. Ford Motor Co. will stand alone in its ability to produce what ever vehicles it chooses until 2017 when new Auto standards go into effect.

The closing of a multitude of auto manufacturing plants and, by extension, their parts suppliers, as well as about 2600 GM dealerships won’t sit well with the tens of thousands of people that will loose their jobs. None of these people will have that “future” that he spoke of.

Sorry folks but I think the community organizer has bitten off more than he can chew this time. He has never ran any company let alone a car company. I fail to see where he will be able to implement a viable solution to these problems through, what has become a favorite tactic of his, government intervention. It will, I think, lead to the death of an American Icon; The American Auto Industry.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Is Bankruptcy for GM Inevitable?

Economics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
May 11 2009

Experts say a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing is all but inevitable for General Motors. To restructure itself and avoid court

General Motors

General Motors

proceedings GM must convince bondholders to accept at trade of $27 billion in debt for 10 percent of its high risk GM stock. Along with that, the automaker must work out deals with the UAW, commit to factory closures, reduce the number of brands by eliminating or selling brands and force hundreds of dealers out of business; all in less than three weeks.

It has been expected for some time now that this would be the case. The long list of unpleasant financial chores to be done by the auto maker hasn’t changed since February, the tasks at hand just become more daunting as time begins to run out.

Although company executives said last week they would still prefer to restructure out of court, experts say all GM is doing now is lining up majorities of stakeholders to make its court-supervised reorganization (a euphemism for bankruptcy) move more quickly. This is evident in remarks by General Motors CEO Fritz Henderson.

“If we need to pursue bankruptcy, we will make sure that we do it in an expeditious fashion. The exact strategies I’m not getting into today, but we’ll be ready to go if that’s required,”

Bankruptcy threats may just be  a bluff to convince bondholders to take the debt for stock swap deal. This strategy didn’t work for Chrysler as a few bondholders held out, refusing to accept what came to roughly 30 cents on the dollar. Most likely GM will be dealing with some of the same bondholders that created roadblocks for  Chrysler. These bond holders constitute the biggest obstacle to avoiding bankruptcy and making the deal will not be easy. Since the government and the UAW will get more stock for debts owed then the bondholders will, they will be reluctant to make such a deal. As with Chrysler the stubborn ones decided to take their chances with bankruptcy hearings.

The president didn’t much like the hold outs in the Chrysler case. He referred to them as selfish, un-american, and said that he, “does not stand with them”. What does he expect? These companies invested billions in the auto industry and its not their money but their constituents’ money. They have an obligation to their share holders to collect as much of the debt owed them as possible. I know I would be upset if I were an investor in one of those companies that took a massive loss because GM wants to pay only pennies on the dollar.

Under Chapter 11, a company can stay in operation under the protection of the court while it sheds it’s debts and unprofitable assets to emerge in a more stable  financial position.

Yet in the event of a bankruptcy filing we the people can kiss goodbye our $15.5 billion GM has already gotten from the government. They most likely would not be forced to pay that money back. As usual the best option will be the most costly to the American people.

What’s your take on the potential Bankruptcy of GM?

Will it happen or are the blowing smoke to blind those to whom they owe money?

If they do file, is that whats best for General Motors overall?

Its a Cracked World, how do we mend it?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

Auto Industry Isn’t the Only Problem in Michigan

Economics, Politics, State Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Apr 03 2009

Right now the state of Michigan has what is probably the the worst economy in the nation. The unemployment is the highest at over 12%. That’s right 12% in other words 12 out of every 100 people you know is unemployed if you live in Michigan. This is very bad news especially for people like me who live in Michigan.

The largest of concerns in the state right now is that of the auto industry going under. This Titanic of

General Motors Head Quarters

General Motors Head Quarters

industries is sailing towards disaster but the auto industry is just the tip of the iceberg. The President last week said that bankruptcy is the most likely and probably the best option for General Motors and Chrysler. But these options are considered to be catastrophic to these two troubled companies. Both fear that the consumer will baulk at the idea of buying a car or truck from them if they are in bankruptcy proceedings.

One major problem with Michigan’s economy is that it fails in diversification. Michigan has largely depended on the auto industry for decades, probably closer to 100 years would be a more accurate statement. This has been the flagship of the economy and tens of thousands of jobs hang on the auto industry. Not just those employed by The Big Three but by their suppliers as well, if The Big Three go under so do their suppliers. Not to mention the dealerships that stand to go out of business.

As pointed out by Greta VanSusteren of Foxnews textiles industries in other parts of the country make the textiles that go in the interiors of cars. The arm of the auto industry is far reaching. Think about it; I’m sure you will think of some other industries that feel the pinch of the auto industry.

But the problem runs deeper than the auto makers in Detroit, Michigan 10 or 12 years ago was a state known as a job creator according to Steve Moore of The Wall street Journal who spoke with Greta on the subject.

What’s happened in that state - and, by the way, this is an amazing statistic. About 10 to 12 years ago when John Engler was governor, Michigan was one of the leading job creators. And now it is, of course, losing jobs. I think they lose about one job every six minutes in Michigan.

It is just a tragic story, and I think it is a result of too much regulation, overspending, high taxes, and also, Michigan is not a right to work state. And so a lot of factories have moved out of Michigan to states like Tennessee and Texas and Florida.

Governor Jennifer Granholm is of course a big player in the many other reasons why the state is hurting so badly.

Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm

Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm

Many other businesses have left the state to establish their operations in states with lower tax rates and therefore higher profits. You are right about the problems in this state.

“And it is interesting because the governor there, Jennifer Granholm, has been governor for almost eight years now, she has been very much like a Barack Obama in her economic strategy - more spending, higher taxes, we’re going to invest in all these programs.

And it has been a complete catastrophe. And my worry is that Barack Obama wants to make America look like Michigan, not make America look like Texas,” said Moore.

To further expound upon the argument I have found statistics showing that the young talent which Michigan needs to succeed are leaving the state in ever larger numbers. The lack of jobs in the state and higher income and property taxes have chased many graduates out of Michigan.

Here is the article from The Detroit News:

In a nutshell it states in one telling clip, “There are more recent MSU grads in Chicago than in any other metro area — including any community in Michigan. While the Windy City has always been a destination for Spartan grads, the number going there — and other vibrant urban centers such as Minneapolis and New York — is growing.

The number leaving the state has doubled since 2001, from 24 percent to 49 percent, according to a school survey.

Michigan-native grads of the University of Michigan are even more likely to leave — 53 percent left in 2008, according to U-M.

By contrast, a similar survey at North Carolina State, found only 30 percent of graduates left North Carolina.

On average nationally, those earning bachelor’s degrees today can expect to earn $900,000 more over their lifetimes than those with only a high school diploma, according to the Census Bureau.

Multiply that by Michigan’s net loss of 18,000 people with college degrees in 2007 alone, and Michigan faces a devastating future loss in tax revenue.

There are many problems with Michigan’s economy, as I said earlier one of them is diversification. Michigan has all its eggs in one basket (The auto industry), if it is to survive and prosper it needs to spread around its potential.

Granholm has made the effort to do so. But this should have been done decades earlier, she is guilty of what every other governor before her is guilty of; running the state with their heads in the sand. I have seen more and more ads as of late to promote the clean energy industry in Michigan and this is a good idea but its a day late and a dollar short.

Michigan’s economy is suffocating under the the blanket of a heavy tax burden placed on the chest of its citizens and its businesses. As more people leave the state in hopes that the grass is greener on the other side of the state line Michigan’s tax revenues plummet.

To continue  on this course is madness. It’s a Cracked…. State?!

  • Share/Bookmark

Bankruptcy is Obamas’ Plan for GM and Chrysler

Economics, Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Mar 30 2009

The Obama administration announced today that the leading possibility for a restructuring plan for General Motors (GM) and Chrysler is Bankruptcy.  The key factor in this plan is to get the UAW

General Motors Corporation
Image via Wikipedia

to agree to an all new labor contract. This will be a very difficult task for GM to pull off as they have been in contract talks for some time and have not met an agreement. All of this comes about on the heels of General Motors’ CEO Rick Wagoner essentially being fired by President Obama.

Bankruptcy, seeming the only feasible option to most advisers  including the President, would split both automakers into “good” and “bad” elements.

The move would in essence split both companies into their “good” and “bad” components. The government would like to see the “good” GM to be a standalone company, according to an administration official. The “good” Chrysler would be sold to Fiat SpA, assuming that deal is completed, this person said.

This Yin and Yang approach seems is the preference of The Obama Administration as The Wall Street Journal points out:

GM looks increasingly like it will be forced into filing for bankruptcy protection, sometime in mid-to-late May, in a plan where the automaker breaks into two companies, the surviving entity a “new GM” that maintains key brands such as Chevy and Cadillac and some international units, say several people familiar with the situation.

Stakes in this new GM could be given to creditors and UAW members. It is also possible the new company could be sold whole or in parts to investors.

Hopefully President Obama will have some pull with his friends at the UAW as the auto makers will need all the help they can get in negotiating a new contract. Under this Yin and Yang Plan the good GM would not have to oblige tens of billions of dollars in retiree and health care expenditures. Those obligations would be held by the other GM element made up of the less attractive parts of GM like Hummer and Saturn as well as other entities such as under performing plants. This element, the bad element would remain in bankruptcy most likely until a buyer is found for it.

Proceeds from the bad GM sale would go towards paying creditors and GM retirees.

Chrysler’s plan is largely centered around the alliance with Fiat and a new labor contract with the UAW and the reworking of debt deals with its’ creditors.

President Obama went on to say that the failure of the auto industry was due to a lack of leadership in Detroit and in Washington that has gone on for decades. In other words he blamed every one that came before him.

I also find it hypocritical that Mr. Wagoner was fired by the President while the UAW President Ron Gettlefinger was left in his position. What about the CEO of AIG? I don’t even know his name, that says something considering today’s media.

It is foolish for any one to believe for even a moment that the United Auto Workers Union isn’t as much to

The United Auto Workers Union

The United Auto Workers Union

blame for financial failures over the past decade or two. We have all heard the stories of the Jobs bank program sapping millions from the corporation every year. The insane benefits workers and retirees receive, and their overblown wages.

President Obama also blundered when he stated “We cannot, we must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish,”  and then a few moments later stated that every one was going to have to bite the bullet: The Unions, the workers, the companies and the creditors were all going to have to make sacrifices, and if they held out indefinitely their may be no more government bailouts.

He just said, “We cannot, we must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish.”  No one is going to believe that the auto industry would be allowed to fail. GM and Chrysler were also given several months to devise a plan that would make them viable again or they would have to give the money back; so what happens? They were given more time after their plans fell short of expectations today.

And why is it so easy for AIG to receive $160 billion in bailout money but the auto industry has to jump through so many hoops to please Washington before they are awarded such a small fraction of the average Wall Street bailout? Maybe its a matter of campaign contributions. Lets face it, GM and Chrysler employ a lot more people than AIG does. There is a lot more to loose in the auto industry than in the financial sector job wise.

When the American people allow The President to fire executives from private sector firms and install such belligerent hypocrisy in policies toward one group over another it is a sign of a Cracked World.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark