Democrat Vs. Republican - Third Party Solution?

Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Jun 07 2009
Republican Party

Republican Party

Are you fed up with your Party? In the past I have refrained from labeling myself to a specific political party though the values that I hold, the morals that I believe in, the ideology of how to govern have always went against the grain from that of the Democrat ilk. Does that make me a Republican? Not necessarily. There are multiple alternatives to these two political parties. If you fall into neither of these parties you may be in league with a (gasp!) THIRD PARTY!

There seems to be a new kid on the block every election cycle; most voters consider following a third party candidate a lost cause. “They don’t have a big enough following to make a difference.” I remember the warnings of the 2000 election that a vote for Ralph Nader is a vote for  George W. Bush because all it would accomplish is taking a vote away from Al Gore. This is chronicled HERE.

Democrat Party

Democrat Party

Remember Ross Perot? He was a third party candidate and held a huge impact in the 1992 presidential election he received a respectable 19% of the popular vote. That must have scared the hell out of the big two that make up the “Duopoly” in Washington.

These are just a couple of examples of third party candidates and clearly the two who had the greatest impact in modern politics.

As stated earlier I tend to fall at odds with Democrats on most if not all accounts of politics; by the same token many Republican politicians have rubbed me wrong as of late and it at times seems as though their entire party is crumbling at its very foundations. I do not call myself a Republican, I am a Conservative. A Conservative Party Member? Not necessarily, I hold conservative values but that is a dieing thing within the Republican Party its not a wonder they lost the 2008 election across the board, they have all moved to far left. The right wing is now in the center!

These two dogmas both assume they only have to defeat the other to win the White House they spend all of their energy snarking each other and have both lost site of why they are there; to serve the people who voted them into office based on the issues and opinions they held during election.

Its time for a wake up call!

So what are people like me to do? Revolt on the Duopoly? This doesn’t sound realistic on many fronts but over time it may over take one of the Big Two.

These Third Parties would have to move concisely, patiently, and wisely. Closely following the desires of the American people and learning from the mistakes of the aforementioned Big Two.

Take heart your choices are great, look at the already long and ever growing list of third party choices there are to choose from.

  • CONSTITUTION PARTY
  • GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
  • LIBERTARIAN PARTY
  • AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY
  • AMERICAN REFORM PARTY
  • INDEPENDENCE PARTY LABOR PARTY
  • U.S. MARIJUANA PARTY (No I’m not making it up)

More information on all of these parties can be found HERE. Yes even the U.S. Marijuana Party - seriously. Some where out there there is a party for you. Possibly you need to form your own political party that holds your views. Obviously any one can do a bunch of dope smokers did it why can’t you?

Imagine the day that one of these parties, or some other garners a large portion of votes in a future election. That would scare the hell out of the Democrats and Republicans.

All of us here at Cracked World know it doesn’t have to be that way but its up to us to fix it.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

GM Bankruptcy Bad for America

Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
Jun 01 2009

As expected it was announced today that GM filed chapter 11 bankruptcy. While this is no surprise and many

General Motors Head Quarters

General Motors Head Quarters

believe it is the best thing that could have happened to the Auto maker it will be a bitter pill to swallow. Already the Obama administration has handed over another $33 billion of government (taxpayer) funds. This brings the total to well over $50 billion leaving many Americans are skeptical including myself.Don’t take my word for it, here’s a poll conducted by Fox Forums. At the time of this writing 92% think we will never see the money we “sank” in GM also known as Government Motors.

I for one would like to know exactly what Obama’s intentions are.

“Our goal is to help GM get back on its feet … and get out quickly,” Obama said.

He said the government would act as “reluctant shareholders” and that he has “no interest” in running GM. Yet the federal government now holds a 60% interest in General Motors.

Foxnews.com supplied an outline of GM’s bankruptcy plan.

The outlines of the restructured GM are as follows:

  • Cut GM’s production break-even point from 16 million annual unit sales to 10 million.
  • UAW concessions include allowing GM to shed its $20 billion obligation to its pensions and health care fund, otherwise known as the VEBA. The White House said the UAW concessions were more substantial than those sought by the Bush administration when it was considering throwing the company a taxpayer lifeline.
  • Bondholders representing at least 54 percent of the company’s unsecured bonds have agreed to trade their portion of GM’s $27.1 billion in unsecured debt for a pro-rated share of 10 percent of the equity in the so-called new GM. In addition, the bondholders will receive warrants for an additional 15 percent of the company. The bankruptcy process, which the White House said should take between 60 and 90 days, will enforce this distribution as well as adjudicate proceeds for bondholders who do not participate in the White House deal.
  • The reorganized GM will buy most of the old GM assets needed to carry out its business plan. The purchase will happen in the Chapter 11 process. In exchange, the U.S. government will relinquish a majority of its loans to GM.– The new GM will create an independent trust (VEBA) that will finance health care benefits for GM’s retirees. The VEBA will be funded by a note of $2.5 billion payable in three installments that end in 2017. There will be an additional $6.5 billion purchase that will create 9 percent perpetual preferred stock. The VEBA will also receive 17.5 percent of the equity of New GM and warrants to purchase an additional 2.5 percent of the company. The VEBA will be able to chose one independent director for the new board. It will have no right to vote its shares or other exercise other governance rights.– The GM-qualified pensions for current hourly and salaried employees will be transferred to the new GM.
  • Treasury will provide $30.1 billion of debtor-in-possession financing to support GM through an accelerated Chapter 11 process. Officials anticipate no additional funding for GM. “There is no plan of any kind for future support beyond this point,” an official said.The government will receive $8.8 billion in debt and preferred stock and 60 percent of the company’s equity. Treasury will appoint all new board of directors members not appointed by the VEBA and the Canadian government.
  • Governments in Canada and Ontario will lend $9.5 billion to GM and the new GM. The Canadian and Ontario governments will receive approximately $1.7 billion in debt and preferred stock, and approximately 12 percent of the equity of the new GM. The Canadian government will select one director to the new GM board.
  • The new GM will, as part of the government-supervised restructuring, build a new small car in an idled UAW factory. The goal is to increase the share of U.S. production for U.S. sale from 66 percent currently to 70 percent.

These are the White House “principles” for managing the ownership stake:

  • The government will sell equity stakes as “soon as practicable.” The goal is a profitable company without government involvement.– The government will reserve the right to set up-front conditions to protect taxpayers, promote financial stability and encourage growth.
  • The government will manage its ownership stake in a hands-off, commercial manner. It will not interfere with day-to-day company operations. No government employees will serve on the boards or be employed by these companies.
  • The government will only vote on core governance issues, including the selection of a company’s board of directors and major corporate events or transactions.

So the sale of equity stakes will take place, “as soon as practicable.” Kind of like all of the Banks the government currently owns which are not allowed to pay back the TARP money they received a few months ago?

The government will only vote on core governance issues,like the selection of the company’s board members and major corporate transactions. This still allows them to stack the deck with whom ever they want to run the company. After all Obama did fire former CEO Richard Wagner. So I would expect him to put in place a puppet board to run the company as he sees fit.

Shortly after the filings were made official President Obama made a speech, something he seems to be making a pass time of, to address the bankruptcy issue. In this speech he made some ghastly statements concerning it’s effect on the state of the economy.

I will not pretend the hard times are over. Difficult days lie ahead. More jobs will be lost. More plants will close. More dealerships will shut their doors, and so will many parts suppliers. But I want you to know that what you’re doing is making a sacrifice for the next generation, a sacrifice you may not have chose to make, but a sacrifice you are nevertheless called to make so that your children and  of our children can grow up in America that still makes things, that still builds cars, that still strives for a better future.

Sacrifice? Sacrifice? Sacrifice for a better future. President Obama didn’t care about our childrens’  future when he squandered it away in all of his ridiculous spending plans that he has shoved down our throats over the last 4 months.

We already know that the government is going to control the kinds of cars and trucks that the Auto makers will be allowed to make by imposing new emissions and fuel economy restrictions on the car companies; and in doing so he is guiding GM and Chrysler in the direction he wants them to go in. Ford Motor Co. will stand alone in its ability to produce what ever vehicles it chooses until 2017 when new Auto standards go into effect.

The closing of a multitude of auto manufacturing plants and, by extension, their parts suppliers, as well as about 2600 GM dealerships won’t sit well with the tens of thousands of people that will loose their jobs. None of these people will have that “future” that he spoke of.

Sorry folks but I think the community organizer has bitten off more than he can chew this time. He has never ran any company let alone a car company. I fail to see where he will be able to implement a viable solution to these problems through, what has become a favorite tactic of his, government intervention. It will, I think, lead to the death of an American Icon; The American Auto Industry.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Share/Bookmark

Why Ann Coulter is Hated by Left Wing Liberals

Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
May 24 2009

I recently seen Ann Coulter on Larry King Live I now realize why liberals hater her.  She handed Larry Kings fill in Joy

Ann Coulter - Conservative Pundit

Ann Coulter - Conservative Pundit

Behar her head. I don’t think she will be invited on to that show again anytime soon. In all fairness Behar was outclassed she is not a political analyst she’s just a talk show host on The View. Ann Coulter has written at least 5 Best Selling books on politics, she is a well respected conservative pundit. Behar is just another sheep in the herd, mindlessly regurgitating the liberal rhetoric that she hears from the ever so loonier left on a daily basis and attempting to make sensible points out of the idiocrity that is the dogma of the liberal democrat.

Any one who has ever seen The View can see that all of the women on this show are all liberal cooks accept for Elizabeth Hasselbeck. The others always gang up on her on political issues because she’s not a liberal tree hugger like the rest of them. But Ann Coulter is a much bigger fish than Elizabeth Hasslebeck is. She is not one for kid gloves, she likes to  play hardball.

Coulter is very shrewd and not easily duped into gaffes or cornered on her views. Its not hard to see why many on the left want to silence and discredit Coulter and others like her.

  • Rush Limbaugh is hated probably more than any of them
  • Sean Hannity is a daunting challenge for all the little tree huggers and liberals. Just ask Alec Baldwin (if you can stand to listen to him).
  • Glenn Beck is disliked by liberals because they can’t brand him a republican.
  • Dick Cheney has been rather vocal as of late and they are just outraged that he is defending the Bush years on the airwaves.
  • Micheal Savage is another right wing terrorist quick some one call the CIA - oh wait they’re not trustworthy enough to handle him according to Nancy Pelosi.

These guys are all prominent pains in liberal asses - Pun intended. But the video clip below really hammers home why. Ann Coulter should write an autobiography and call it “Vicious.” I always thought she would be most well known for having the longest neck in politics but this video shows how vicious and brutally relentless she can be. She clearly holds no punches. That folks will be her legacy sheer tenacity.

Ann Coulter personifies why left wing extremists hate those of her ilk. “Do you want to be aborted?!?!” OUCH!!! That had to smart. It was like a Joe Biden press conference only Joy didn’t do it to herself, she was ambushed. Coulter must have thought this up and just waited for the question to be asked.

You gotta love it!

I literally laughed out loud when I first heard this. Behar must be embarrassed to show her face on TV again.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

Nancy Pelosi Called Out by CIA

National Security, Politics | Posted by C.C.Mitchell
May 18 2009

The Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi continues to find herself in hot water over her decrial of the treatment of detained enemy combatants in Guantanamo Bay Cuba(Gitmo).  It is now evident that Speaker Pelosi knew full well what treatment conditions were at Gitmo.

Nancy Pelosi tried to cash in politically by speaking out about the use of water boarding and other so called forms

Seal of the Central Intelligence Agency of the...
Image via Wikipedia

of torture on terrorist locked up in Gitmo while trying to crank up some anti-republican sentiment at the same time. When asked why she allowed it to continue, being on the House Intelligence Committee which deals with these issues, she had the power to put down the CIA in its attempts to glean new information from terrorists held captive in Gitmo, she responded by saying that she was lied to by the CIA about  Waterboarding. Claiming she never knew it was being used.

This is a lie according to CIA:

An unclassified chart released last month by the CIA describes a total of 40 briefings for lawmakers over a period of several years on enhanced interrogation techniques. Pelosi’s name appears once, as having attended a session on Sept. 4, 2002, when she was the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. Former Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., who at the time was the chairman of the committee and later became CIA director, also was present.

As Speaker Pelosi attempted to back away from responsibility and knowledge of the CIAs tactics she accused the Central Intelligence Agency of lying about the briefings.

“Yes I am saying the CIA was misleading the Congress”

Today House Minority Leader John Boehner called out The Speaker of the House saying she needs to put up or shut up.  Boehner thinks Pelosi should present either evidence of a deception or an apology.

“Lying to Congress is a crime. Purposely misleading Congress is a crime. And if the speaker is accusing the intelligence community of lying to her or purposefully misleading her, then she ought to present that evidence, turn it over to the Justice Department, have them prosecute it.”

She has yet to produce evidence that she was lied too. Yet the CIA has released several statements dismissing the allegations. A good deal of the tell tail documents concerning this topic that would prove to be the smoking gun are classified, Pelosi is counting on these documents never coming to light. She has changed her story numerous times concerning her knowledge of water boarding and other “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques”. Originally she knew nothing, that story has evolved into knowing a little bit.

In my opinion

First off:

The Speakers’ story doesn’t add up. Why would the CIA lie about their methods when The Bush Administration told them it was legal and within the standards of treatment? They had no reason to deceive any one.

CIA Director Leon Panetta , a former Democratic lawmaker from Pelosi’s home state of California, said records from the period “indicate that CIA officers briefed truthfully on the interrogation of (terrorist suspect) Abu Zubaydah, describing `the enhanced techniques that had been employed.’”

Many of her own colleagues and Democrat partners are backing away from her statements and some, as stated above, are even siding against her.

I think she’s a liar and a traitor and I know I’m not the only one.

Secondly:

WASHINGTON - DECEMBER 5: Speaker of the House-...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

I don’t have a problem with waterboarding. Any means necessary, that’s what we should employ to gain intelligence from these scum of the earth murderers. Nothing should be off limits. We should also let their fellow killers back home know what will happen to them if they mess with us.

I am not convinced that these tactics, or any others for that matter, are too harsh to be used on people who would gladly die to kill us anyway. They are all martyrs are they not?

What I would consider too harsh is crashing an airliner into a building they are trapped in and letting them die under a heap of rubble and burning jet fuel— Oh wait! Thats what they did to us. Remember? 19 Hijackers were hailed as heroes in their home lands for murdering 3000 people.

In short I don’t give a damn about what happens to any of these murderous thugs. Let them out of Gitmo, but let them out in the middle of the ocean in shark infested waters and let them swim for it, just don’t forget to chum the waters first.

How does Waterboarding sound now?

Its a Cracked World when we cannot trust our own government figures to put America ahead of their own self interests.

  • Share/Bookmark